Cis and Trans Isomerism: Energetics and Biological Consequences

The partial double-bond character of the peptide bond gives rise to cis and trans isomers defined by the arrangement of substituents across the C–N bond. For non-proline residues, the trans isomer dominates overwhelmingly. For proline, the energy difference is small enough that cis isomers are biologically significant, and their slow interconversion is exploited as a timing mechanism in protein folding and cell signaling.

Key Terms

Trans peptide bond
The peptide bond conformation in which the two α-carbons flanking the amide unit are on opposite sides of the C–N bond (ω = 180°). This is the strongly preferred conformation for non-proline residues.
Cis peptide bond
The peptide bond conformation in which the two α-carbons flanking the amide unit are on the same side of the C–N bond (ω = 0°). Rare for non-proline residues; significant for proline.
Omega angle, ω
The backbone torsion angle defined by the atoms Cα–C–N–Cα, describing the rotation about the peptide bond. Trans corresponds to ω ≈ 180°; cis to ω ≈ 0°.
Peptidyl-prolyl isomerase, PPIase
An enzyme that catalyzes the cis-trans isomerization of peptide bonds preceding proline residues, accelerating what would otherwise be a slow spontaneous interconversion.
Prolyl isomerization
The interconversion between cis and trans conformations of the peptide bond N-terminal to a proline residue, a process that is slow on the timescale of protein folding and can act as a molecular switch.

Two Faces of the Peptide Bond

The partial double-bond character of the C–N bond, established in Article 2.2, has a geometric consequence that goes beyond planarity. Because rotation about the C–N bond is restricted, the two substituents on either side of the bond, the α-carbon of the preceding residue and the α-carbon of the following residue, are fixed relative to each other in one of two arrangements. In the trans arrangement, the two α-carbons are on opposite sides of the C–N bond. In the cis arrangement, they are on the same side. These two arrangements interconvert only by rotation through the high-energy transition state that disrupts the partial π bond, and at physiological temperatures they are effectively distinct species on the timescale of many biological processes.

The Energetics of Trans and Cis

For non-proline peptide bonds, the trans isomer is overwhelmingly preferred. The energy difference between trans and cis is approximately 2 to 3 kcal/mol in favor of trans, corresponding to a trans/cis ratio of roughly 1000:1 at equilibrium. [8] The preference for trans arises primarily from steric considerations: in the cis arrangement, the side chains and backbone atoms of the two flanking residues are in closer proximity, generating unfavorable steric interactions. The trans arrangement places these groups on opposite sides of the bond, minimizing steric clash.

The consequence for peptide structure is that essentially all non-proline peptide bonds in folded proteins and synthetic peptides adopt the trans conformation. Surveys of high-resolution crystal structures confirm this: non-proline cis peptide bonds are found in less than 0.05 percent of backbone positions, and when they do occur, they are invariably in unusual structural contexts and often near the active sites of enzymes where their occurrence is functionally relevant. [9]

Proline: The Exception That Defines the Rule

Proline is unique among the canonical amino acids in that its side chain cyclizes back onto the backbone nitrogen, forming a five-membered pyrrolidine ring. This ring eliminates the NH hydrogen of the amide unit and replaces it with a carbon substituent. The critical consequence for cis-trans isomerism is steric: in the trans conformation of a prolyl peptide bond, the Cδ of the pyrrolidine ring and the α-carbon of the preceding residue are on opposite sides of the bond, as in a normal trans amide. In the cis conformation, the Cδ and the preceding α-carbon are on the same side, a sterically demanding arrangement, but one that is far less costly for proline than the equivalent cis arrangement would be for a residue with a simple NH group.

The result is that the energy difference between cis and trans prolyl peptide bonds is only approximately 0.5 to 1.0 kcal/mol, compared to 2 to 3 kcal/mol for non-proline amides. [10] This small energy difference means that both isomers are significantly populated at equilibrium: approximately 5 to 30 percent of prolyl peptide bonds exist in the cis configuration in unfolded peptides, with the exact ratio depending on the identity of the residue preceding the proline.

Slow Interconversion: A Kinetic Consequence

The rotational barrier for cis-trans isomerization of the peptide bond is approximately 15 to 20 kcal/mol, as noted in Article 2.2. At physiological temperature, this corresponds to a spontaneous isomerization rate of approximately 0.01 to 0.1 per second, a half-life of seconds to minutes. This is slow by the standards of most molecular processes in biology, where conformational changes, binding events, and chemical reactions typically occur on microsecond to millisecond timescales.

The kinetic consequence is that cis-trans isomerization of prolyl peptide bonds can become rate-limiting in protein folding. When an unfolded protein refolds, any proline residues that were in the cis conformation in the unfolded state must isomerize to trans before the protein can reach its native structure. This isomerization is slow enough to create a distinct slow-folding phase observable in stopped-flow refolding experiments, a phase that disappears when prolines are mutated to other residues. [8]

Peptidyl-Prolyl Isomerases: Solving the Kinetic Problem

The slow spontaneous rate of prolyl isomerization creates a biological problem: proteins containing proline residues in non-native isomeric states would fold too slowly for biological utility. Evolution solved this problem with enzymes called peptidyl-prolyl isomerases, universally abbreviated PPIases, which catalyze the cis-trans interconversion of prolyl peptide bonds by several orders of magnitude. [10]

Three structurally unrelated families of PPIases have been identified: the cyclophilins, the FK506-binding proteins, FKBPs, and the parvulins. Cyclophilins are the target of the immunosuppressant cyclosporine, and FKBPs are the target of rapamycin and FK506, making these enzyme families of direct pharmacological importance. The discovery that two major immunosuppressive drugs act by inhibiting PPIases was a landmark in the intersection of peptide chemistry and cell signaling. [11]

PPIases catalyze isomerization by stabilizing the transition state for C–N bond rotation, effectively twisting the amide bond to reduce its double-bond character transiently. The mechanistic details differ among the three families, but all exploit the same fundamental approach: destabilizing the ground state partial π bond to lower the rotational barrier.

Cis Prolyl Bonds in Folded Proteins

Not all prolyl isomerization is a problem to be corrected. A significant fraction of proline residues in folded proteins, approximately 5 to 6 percent, adopt the cis conformation in the native structure. [9] These cis prolyl bonds are structurally encoded: they create local backbone geometries that are accessible only with a cis peptide bond, including tight turns and specific loop conformations that cannot be achieved with a trans bond at that position.

Cis prolyl bonds in folded proteins are typically buried and strained, contributing to the conformational energy of the folded state. Their presence is detectable by NMR, where the chemical shift difference between cis and trans prolyl carbons is diagnostic, and by X-ray crystallography. When a protein folds, any proline residue destined for a cis conformation in the native structure must isomerize from the initially random population, a process that PPIases accelerate in vivo.

Non-Proline Cis Peptide Bonds: Rare but Functional

The small population of non-proline cis peptide bonds found in high-resolution crystal structures is not merely noise. Statistical analysis shows that non-proline cis bonds are enriched near the active sites of enzymes and at protein-protein interfaces, suggesting that they are under positive selection for function. [9] The conformational constraint imposed by a cis bond places the flanking residues in a geometry that may be essential for catalytic activity or binding.

In synthetic peptide design, the deliberate introduction of cis peptide bond geometry through backbone modification, for example using azapeptide or peptoid residues that alter the cis-trans energy balance, is an emerging strategy for accessing conformational space unavailable to standard trans peptide chains. This connects the fundamental physical chemistry of cis-trans isomerism directly to contemporary peptidomimetic design, a topic developed in Chapter 22.

References

  • [8] Brandts, J. F., Halvorson, H. R., & Brennan, M. (1975). Consideration of the possibility that the slow step in protein denaturation reactions is due to cis-trans isomerism of proline residues. Biochemistry, 14(22), 4953–4963.
  • [9] Jabs, A., Weiss, M. S., & Hilgenfeld, R. (1999). Non-proline cis peptide bonds in proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 286(1), 291–304.
  • [10] Fischer, G. (1994). Peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerases and their effectors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 33(14), 1415–1436.
  • [11] Lu, K. P., Finn, G., Lee, T. H., & Nicholson, L. K. (2007). Prolyl cis-trans isomerization as a molecular timer. Nature Chemical Biology, 3(10), 619–629.
Previous 2.2 Resonance and Planarity: Why the … Next 2.4 The Special Case of Proline: …

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Log in to leave a comment.

On This Page

Article Info

Views: 11
cis-trans isomerism omega angle trans peptide bond cis peptide bond proline protein folding isomerization PPIase